About Me

Name:Conservabear
Email: conservabear@comcast.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Bear In The Woods is Back

HMMMM, What would Reagan Do?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHO4M_Tar7A 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russia Invading Georgia, Can You Find A Better Reason, To Be Energy Independent?

It is now a matter of national security.

We have been advising, cajoling and telling you government leaders for months of the necessity for drilling oil, and not only oil, but also any of our natural energy resources, and still you refuse to hear. What will it take to consider our looming energy crisis seriously? Must a Russian love letter land on our doorstep before you get your heads out of the sand? How about the destruction of foreign oil fields, will this motivate you?   You must realize the situation we currently find ourselves in this world. We have drug gangland wars on our southern border. Islamic Extremist Terrorism haunts us at every turn. Iran still cannot be trusted, though having supposedly reversed it’s stance on destroying Israel and The USA. I believe they are saying one thing and plotting our demise at the same time. I never trusted Mr. Putin. John McCain was correct when he said he saw KGB in Putin's eyes. North Korea and China still require watching. I have learned that past actions are a great forecaster of future actions and believe me none of those nations has an overwhelmingly benign record. Now I do not want to hear from you left-wing loons about the USA's real, perceived or imagined sins at this time or how God should punish us for these sins. I am frankly tired of hearing it. Never the less, I will undoubtedly hear from you and we will, of course lock horns. I will however acknowledge, we helped create this monster by helping Russia develop their oil production and now they have turned on us. Now, do not think for a minute Russia did not plan to invade Georgia or that the Georgian Government is not blameless.   If Georgia has acted criminally towards South Osetia, then of course Georgia must be held accountable how, I would assume will be a matter left to the investigation and trials by the International Court, until that time Russia must cease fire and withdraw from Georgia. As far as the US is concerned our energy policy must be fast-tracked immediately, there must be no further delay. Before this newest setback, I would have suggested we wait until the Oil Moratorium expires in October, but now we have new concerns.   It is no longer just a matter of oil drilling and environmental concerns.   It is a matter of autonomy.   No government or cause Celebes should hamstring a nation's economy and energy policy for the sake of computer models created by folks who have no business in the energy business.                   

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain to Woo NJ's 15 Electoral Votes

McCain to campaign in New Jersey, He will visit Bergen County on August 12, 2008. 
 
My question: will Mr. McCain appear in South Jersey as well, or will we wave adrift in the wind like Saturday's Laundry?  After all, we might as well be part of Philly for what little representation we have on the Hill and forget about Gov. Corzine,  he would rather raise our taxes than cause any inconvenience to our precious tourism industry by drilling off the New Jersey coast.  He must not realize oil rigs, for the most part are barely detectable from the shore, as they are many miles out in the ocean.   I imagine, he did not read about the benefits of oil drilling on the environment either. 
 
Please forgive me, do I seem a bit ungrateful right now?  Am I complaining?  Well,  I would also prefer some cheese with my whine,  after all I have seen our leaders do the same and I do not want to feel left-out.
Please read email copy below:
 
From:            "Dominick Fiorilli" <dfiorilli@mccain08hq.com>

To:                 "Dominick Fiorilli" dfiorilli@mccain08hq.com

Subject:         In Case You Missed It.

Date:              Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:50:18 PM

 

For Immediate Release

Contact: Press Office

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

609-433-8746

 

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
"McCain to return for more N.J. votes"

 

“In late June, McCain signaled he would compete for New Jersey’s 15 electoral votes by opening a campaign headquarters in Woodbridge Township, Middlesex County. … McCain was the first Republican candidate to open a headquarters in New Jersey since 1992.” – The Press of Atlantic City

 

"Electoracle: McCain to return for more N.J. votes"

John Froonjian

The Press of Atlantic City

August 6, 2008

 

The presidential campaign in New Jersey has looked a lot like the John McCain Show lately.

The presumptive Republican nominee has campaigned in the Garden State a number of times and is returning soon. His New Jersey supporters hold news conferences and regularly promote his positions. McCain has a New Jersey headquarters, and his campaign floods reporters with news releases every day.

His opponent, Democrat Barack Obama, has not campaigned in the state since the day before the Feb. 5 primary. Part of the reason is that Obama expects to win the Democratic-leaning state easily. But his campaign has had a low public profile here while McCain’s team loudly proclaims that it is making New Jersey competitive.

“I’ve been surprised at how they have allowed us to occupy the field,” said state Sen. Bill Baroni, R-Middlesex, Mercer, McCain’s New Jersey chairman. “But we’ll keep doing what we’ve been doing.”

The imbalance in the campaigns’ visibility may soon begin to change. Obama has appointed a state director to build up his New Jersey operation. And Democrats say just because they’re not holding news conferences doesn’t mean Obama’s campaign isn’t busy here. It has been registering voters, training organizers, holding house parties and raising money in New Jersey.

Obama spokeswoman Gannet Tseggai said the campaign is prepared to capitalize on the high enthusiasm reflected in hundreds of thousands of newly registered Democrats. She said Obama’s strategy is to build a grass-roots movement from the bottom up. The campaign hopes to tie the new voters in with the state’s Democratic organization to create a massive Election Day turnout.

“In the coming weeks, more of those activities will become evident to the press,” she said.

“It’s not who starts first. It’s who finishes first,” added Rich McGrath, Democratic State Committee director.

But New Jersey Republicans hope their party is gaining traction while Democrats cede the early spotlight to McCain.

The Arizona senator is scheduled to stump in Bergen County on Aug. 12. It will be his fifth public appearance in the state during this campaign. In late June, McCain signaled he would compete for New Jersey’s 15 electoral votes by opening a campaign headquarters in Woodbridge Township, Middlesex County. Democrats scoff that it’s a regional base that also covers New York. But McCain was the first Republican candidate to open a headquarters in New Jersey since 1992. He has five full-time staffers working in the state, Baroni said.

McCain supporters have publicly beaten the drum for their candidate’s tax, energy and environmental policies. A New Jersey Veterans for McCain group formed July 22. But now, the Obama campaign has appointed a labor leader with Camden County roots and deep knowledge of New Jersey politics as state director. Tricia Mueller, who handles political work for the New Jersey Regional Council of Carpenters, will direct Obama’s state operation. Robert Decheine, chief of staff for Rep. Steve Rothman, D-7th -- an early Obama supporter -- will be a senior adviser to the campaign. Republican Baroni, who worked with Mueller on one of Baroni’s state legislative campaigns, praises Mueller as “one of the best political operatives in the country.” He said the Democrats’ selection of Mueller signals how seriously they take the McCain threat in New Jersey. Some Democrats claim they are happy to see McCain spend resources in a state where they expect him to lose.

McGrath said added exposure in New Jersey will show McCain to be an ideological soul mate of President Bush. For example, McCain’s embrace of offshore oil drilling forced Republican candidates to distance themselves from their nominee on the issue. But while state Democrats lambasted the drilling proposal, no one specifically speaking for Obama was front and center in New Jersey. Expect more public give and take in the coming months. With Obama leading in polls here, the candidate is not scheduled to campaign in New Jersey anytime soon. McCain is expected back in two weeks.

If McCain’s efforts start eating away at Obama’s lead, New Jersey voters will probably start seeing a lot of the Democrat, too.

###

Peter A. Feldman

Regional Communications Director

John McCain 2008

40 New Brunswick Avenue

Woodbridge, NJ 08861

Office: (732) 479-4780

Cell: (609) 433-8746

Fax: (732) 486-8532

Dominick Fiorilli

Regional Campaign Manager

Phone:    732-479-4784

Fax:         732-486-8532

Cell:        732-781-8635

www.johnmccain.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (19) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Letter to Representative, Robert E. Andrews, (D-NJ 1st)

 

Dear Congressman, Robert E. Andrews,

I am asking you to reconsider your opposition to offshore oil drilling and its potential impact to the economy, our nation's security and autonomy as a sovereign nation.

I support offshore drilling off the coast of New Jersey for the following reasons.

1.   Oil Drilling relieves the surplus oil pressure under the ocean floor thereby alleviating natural oil seepage through cracks and crevices. Unchecked natural seepage of petroleum oil causes contamination of water and beaches and if it remains unchecked will equal the Exxon Valdez oil spill in a few years.

2.   Oil rigs encourage the flourishing of marine life by providing a manufactured reef that attracts said marine life.

3.   Marine Biologists and other Environmental Scientists work closely with oil companies to maintain a balanced, safe, and marine friendly environment.

4.   Oil rigs are usually located many miles from the shoreline and therefore have little effect on the appearance of the shoreline or its impact on the tourism industry.

4A. China is drilling some 50 or 60 miles from our coast for Cuba no less. Why therefore, are we not permitted?

5.    There are over 4000 products made from, with or containing petroleum, distillates and by products. Not only gasoline and diesel are effected but anything that has a combustible engine such as ships including fishing vessels, people and cargo air and water transports, pharmaceuticals, plastics and building supplies, cleaning products etc and don't forget the people who use oil for home heating in the winter who cannot afford to retrofit their houses for natural gas or other alternative fuels.

6.   Your constituents who need oil to heat their homes.

7.   It will not take 10 years to make an impact on the oil supply. Some estimates say as little as 3 years and if we start now it may take even less.

8. Bill Clinton gave the same 10-year excuse for not drilling and we could have had oil by now.

9. The Republicans and Bush administration had almost 8 years to increase oil production and did nothing.

10. The Republicans are seeing the errors of their ways and attempting to correct the situation but they need your help.

11. Oil is a national security issue due to its effect on our economy.

12. We need to be energy independent from foreign oil especially from unfriendly nations.

13. Global warming is a theory only it depends on computer models and not hard exact science of which there is so little.

14. Until we can develop better more efficient, cleaner, safer energy alternatives, we need to use the natural resources God Gave Us.

15. Plants and Trees love carbon dioxide experiments have shown plants grow larger and healthier in an environment rich in carbon dioxide.

16. Encourage oil-profits to be used for development and successful implementation of green energies.

17. Oil companies and other existing energy companies know far more than we do about how to produce energy. Would you go to your barber to clean and repair your teeth?

18. If our economy goes down the tube, so do any means of supporting ourselves or providing for charitable causes.

19. Nancy Pelosi appears to be running for dictator of the US.

20. The people demand it and the country needs it.

Thank You for Your Kind Consideration to This Matter.
 
Sincerely,
 
Mrs. LMH
 
 
 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (30) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congress Apologizes for Slavery

Folks,
 
Today we have reached a new milestone or millstone if one is a bit cynical like me, It would appear after some 232 years of Independence Declaring, Congress has now decided to issue an apology for the practicing of slavery and Jim crow segregation against African Americans.  
 
http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?
storyId=93059465&ft=1&f=1070#share
 
I have very mixed emotions about this.   Perhaps if I were of another mind or I held a Liberal view as was my want in life some 30 years ago, I should be overjoyed by this awe inspiring news, virtually tripping afleet of foot down the golden pathways of hysterical happiness.  However a new bear has been seen growling through the woods these days and this bear has many questions. 
 
There have been apologies aplenty concerning man's inhumanity to man.   My Question: why now congress, why after 232 years or so,  have you decided to issue an apology at this time.  Of course I am not saying an apology is wrong and that such an apology should have been made some some 200 years ago and it was not.  I am merely questioning the timeliness of such a resolution. 
 
My opinion:  No man, woman, or child should ever be enslaved by another, for all men are created equal in the eyes of God and have rights in and under the law. 
 
To enslave another human being is to deny that person as human and insuch causing that person to be regarded and treated as an inferior being equivelent to being an animal, thus harming that person.  Therefore, slavery is a sin against God who gave us human rights in the first place and against each other.
 
My concern is now that the apology has been given, will we all be able to live in peace?  Will we feel free to discuss our differences reasonably?  Will we develop ways of accepting each other because of our differences, physical, mental, religious or otherwise?  Can we help erradicated slavery in other parts of the world by working with other peoples so they don't make the same mistakes of the past or is history doomed to repeat itself?   Will Black Americans, Native Americans and other people of color hold those people not of their race accountable for the people who lived here before.  Please remember not all people of color living today in the US had ancestors who were enslaved in the US.  Some people came to the US by their own free will from countries who may or may not have enslaved them.  Some people had ancestors who were considered freemen and thus not enslaved.  Not all people enslaved others.    Even today there are exceptions to any generalization.  We could have opinions about non-documented aliens vs documented aliens and naturalized citizens of all colors.  We can discuss the horrible practice of children and woman forced into labor or sex slavery or even white slavery.  Again let me be clear, slavery is absolutely an abomination.
 
My other concern:  Are we to be reminded constantly of the failings of the forebearers of this Country even though many of our ancestors were not involved in this period of time, or is it the old sins of the fathers thing, these not being our fathers.  Will we need to pay reparations for the rest of our lives and our descendents?
 
My Prayer: Dear Lord Teach Us to Love One Another as You Have Loved Us.
 
What say you folks?  How do you feel about today's latest resolution.
 
Thank You,
 
Mrs LMH
 
Information:
Slavery is an abhorrent practice and is still in existence today in parts of the world. http://www.globalaware.org/Artlicles_eng/slave_art_eng.htm
 
 
Slavery as defined below by http://www.yourdictionary.com/slavery

Slavery 

slavery
Definition

slav·ery (slav?r e, slavre)

noun

  1. the owning or keeping of slaves as a practice or institution; slaveholding
  2. the condition of being a slave; bondage; servitude
  3. a condition of submission to or domination by some influence, habit, etc.
  4. hard work or toil like that done by slaves; drudgery

 

Slavery Synonyms

Slavery

n.

  1. Bondage

    bondage, servitude, thralldom, enthrallment, subjection, subjugation, serfdom, constraint, captivity, restraint, bond service, vassalage, involuntary servitude; see also captivity.

  2. The use of slaves as an institution

    owning slaves, slaveholding, slave-owning, practicing slavery, holding slaves, the peculiar institution*; see also sense 1.

  3. Drudgery

    toil, menial labor, grind; see work 2.

slavery implies absolute subjection to another person who owns and completely controls one; servitude refers to compulsory labor or service for another, often, specif., such labor imposed as punishment for crime; bondage originally referred to the condition of a serf bound to his master's land, but now implies any condition of subjugation or captivity

Preposition: of

  • sin: Thus, Christ uses his priceless life to redeem us from the slavery of sin and Satan.

Converse of object

  • abolish: Robbins compares the new movement with the early battles to abolish slavery in the 18th century.
  • outlaw: Muhammad and his successors were rulers and could have outlawed slavery.
  • condemn: Garrison was highly critical of the Church for its refusal to condemn slavery.
  • uphold: Horace Greeley: Do your territorial laws uphold slavery?
  • oppose: The Quakers were one of the first faith communities to oppose slavery.
  • justify: A racist ideology was created to justify slavery and to allow capital accumulation to take place.

Preposition: in

  • colony: This included an act for the abolition of slavery in the colonies and the 1833 Factory Act.
  • empire: Schama will deal with liberty and slavery in the British Empire, and the American Declaration of Independence.

Adjective modifier

  • transatlantic: The conference will focus on the relationship between history, cultural memory and transatlantic slavery.
  • colonial: Also, the racial character of colonial slavery was distinct.
  • sexual: Young girls are often also forced into sexual slavery to service militia.
  • Egyptian: The salt water represents the tears shed during Egyptian slavery.
  • virtual: The elite class deceived the working serfs and kept them in virtual slavery.
  • domestic: The nation thus becomes the new justification for domestic slavery.

Noun used with modifier

  • chattel: It is at least as feeble as the case for chattel slavery.
  • wage: I was content to move on to little clients when I told the bosses where to shove their wage slavery.
  • plantation: Blackburn reminds us, however, that racial slavery was peculiarly associated with plantation slavery.
  • asylum: Nano-science, asylum seeker slavery and more... SchNEWS 477, 10th December, 2004 ZanON and ON and ON!
  • seeker: Nano-science, asylum seeker slavery and more... SchNEWS 477, 10th December, 2004 ZanON and ON and ON!
slavery Quotes

So long as the law considers all these human beings, with beating heartsand living affections,onlyassomany things belonging tothemasteröso long asthefailure, or misfortune, or imprudence, or death of the kindest owner, may cause them any day to exchange a life of kind protection and indulgence for one of hopeless miseryand toilöso long is it impossible to make anything beautiful or desirable in the best-regulated administration of slavery.

—Stowe, Harriet (Elizabeth) ne¤  e Beecher

Machines are worshipped because theyare beautiful, and valued because they confer power; they are hated because they are hideous, and loathed because they impose slavery.

—Russell, Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl

Scots, wha hae wi' Wallace bled, Scots, wham Bruce has aften led, Welcome to your gory bed,ö Or to victorie!ö Now's the day, and now's the hour; See the front o' battle lour; See approach proud Edward's power, Chains and Slaverie!

—Burns, Robert

Es binden Sklavenfesseln nur die H a« nde, Der Sinn, er macht den Freien und den Knecht. The chains of slavery can only bind the hands. The mind makes us either free or enslaved.

—Grillparzer, Franz

La force a fait les premiers esclaves, leur la"  chete¤   les a perpe¤  tue¤  s. Force made the first slaves; their cowardice perpetuated slavery.

—Rousseau,JeanJacques

Indeed the arguments on both sides were invincible; for in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery; but in fact eleven men well armed will certainly subdue one single man in his shirt.

—Swift,Jonathan

Apprenez qu'on ne sort de l'esclavage que par une grande re¤  volution. Learn that one never escapes slavery except by a great revolution.

—Laclos, Pierre-Ambroise Choderlos de

   Extreme freedom can't be expected to lead to anything but a change to extreme slavery, whether for a private individual or for a city.

—Plato

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

—Orwell, George pseudonym of  Eric Arthur Blair

We have counted the cost of this contest, and find nothing so dreadful as voluntary slavery? Our cause is just, our union is perfect.

—Dickinson,John

If all men are born free, how is it that all women are born slaves? as they must be if the being subjected to the inconsistent, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of men, be the perfect condition of slavery? and if the essence of freedom consists, as our masters say it does, in having a standing rule to live by? And why is slavery so much condemnedandstroveagainst inonecase, andsohighly applauded, and held so necessary and so sacred in another?

—Astell, Mary

Let usnever toleratetheslightest inroad onthe discipline of our holy Church. Let us never consent that she should be made the hireling of the Ministry. Our forefathers would have diedönay, perished in hopeless slaveryörather than consent to such degradation.

—O'Connell, Daniel known as  the Liberator

   Slavery broke the world in half, it broke it in every way. It broke Europe.It madethem intosomething else, it made themslave masters, it madethem crazy.You can't dothat for hundreds of years and it not take a toll. They had to dehumanize, not just the slaves but themselves.

—Morrison,Toni Chloe Anthony ne¤  e Wofford

'Slavery's a thing thet depends on complexion, It's God's law thet fetters on black skins don't chafe; Ef brains wuz to settle it (horrid reflection!) Wich of our onnable body'd be safe?'

—Lowell,James Russell

I stopped loving my father a long time ago. What remained was the slavery to a pattern.

—Nin, Ana|«  s

No man can point to any law in the U.S. by which slavery was originally established. Men first make slaves and then make laws.

—Washington Bailey

Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every soil.

—Burke, Edmund

Look at me! Look at myarm!? I have plowed, and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could head meöand ar'n't I a woman? I could work as much and eat as much as a man (when I could get it), and bear de lash as wellöand ar'n't I a woman? I have borne thirteenchilernandseen'emmos'allsoldoff intoslavery, and when I cried out with a mother's grief, none but Jesus heardöand ar'n't I a woman?

—Truth, Sojourner ne¤  e Isabella

The trouble with our people is as soon as they got out of slavery they didn't want to give the white man nothing else.But the fact is, you got to give 'em something. Either your money, your land, your woman or your (donkey).

—Walker, Alice Malsenior

That state is a state of Slavery in which a man does what he likes to do in his spare time and in his working time that which is required of him.

—Gill, (Arthur) Eric Rowton

Facts are generally overesteemed. For most practical purposes, a thing is what men think it is.When they judged the earth flat, it was flat. As long as men thought slavery tolerable, it was tolerable.We live down here among shadows, shadows among shadows.

—Updike,John Hoyer

But when a man who sees the world one way becomes Barker theslave of a manwho interpretstheworld inexactly the opposite way, the result is, to my mind, the worst possible kind of slavery.

—Jones

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (22) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

E News from CAGW: Porker of The Month, & Interesting Points

Newsletter from Citizens Against Government Waste
 
Subscribe at  www.CAGW.org
 
E-News from Citizens Against Government Waste
 
Monday, July 28, 2008 5:41:47 PM
 

e-News from CAGW

 
Porker of the Month:  Rep. John Mica

Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) has named Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.) Porker of the Month for his opposition to an earmark ban and defense of earmarks.  According to the Orlando Sentinel, on July 8, Rep. Mica said, “There’s no way in hell I would support banning earmarks…That’s our job, getting elected and making decisions.  Yes, there are bad earmarks, like there are bad members of Congress.  And what you do is get rid of them.”  Earmarking is not Congress’ “job,” as Rep. Mica claims.  Before the 1980s, Congress would fund general grant programs and let federal and state agencies select individual recipients through a competitive process or formula.  The House and Senate Appropriations Committees named specific projects only when they had been the subject of hearings and approved by authorizing committees.  Members of Congress with local concerns would lobby the president and federal agencies for consideration.  The normal budget process, which is aimed at preventing abuse and allocating resources on the basis of merit and need, has become a sideshow in the scramble by individual Appropriations Committee members to pick winners and losers based on seniority.  For opposing an earmark ban or moratorium and defending the out-of-control earmarking process, CAGW names Rep. John Mica its July 2008 Porker of the Month.  Read more about the Porker of the Month.

CCAGW Slams “Coburn Omnibus” as Harry Reid's Sour Grapes

The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) has urged the Senate to vote against cloture on the Advance America’s Priorities Act, also known as the “Coburn Omnibus,” unless the spending in the bill is offset by spending cuts elsewhere.  Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has placed a legislative “hold” on more than 80 bills since January 2007 to force Congress to debate their merits and costs before subjecting taxpayers to billions of dollars in new spending.  To circumvent the logjam, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has rolled 35 of the bills into one omnibus package costing more than $10 billion.  In a letter to the Senate last week, CCAGW President Tom Schatz wrote, “The magnitude of Congress’ spending problem cannot be overstated.  In the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, the budget deficit was $148 billion higher than in the previous year…This action is another attempt to rubber stamp more government spending…the Senate must carefully examine all the bills and decide whether the programs in question duplicate already existing programs, whether they actually benefit the intended recipients, and whether they are worth spending valuable tax dollars on.”  Read more about the “Coburn Omnibus.”

CCAGW Denounces Housing Bailout Bill

CCAGW this month strongly denounced the Bush Administration’s cave-in on H.R. 3221, The American Housing and Foreclosure Prevention Act, which the president is expected to sign into law this week.  “The Bush Administration’s reversal on its veto threat on H.R. 3221 virtually ensures that taxpayers will be saddled with the huge costs associated with this bill for decades to come.  There are so many bad aspects to this bill, it is almost impossible to know where to begin,” said CCAGW President Tom Schatz.  The bill, which was already expected to cost $300 billion, was changed  to include a rescue plan for the nation’s two housing government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, after they suffered an alarming stock slide on July 11.  The GSE rescue plan, which is expected to cost $25 billion, places taxpayers squarely and explicitly behind the GSEs, but fails to address their critical long-term structural problems or lay claim to any future GSE profits on behalf of taxpayers.  In addition, House Democrats resurrected a controversial $3.9 billion grant program that had been removed from the bill earlier due to opposition from President Bush.  The grant program, designed to assist states and localities in purchasing foreclosed properties, will be just another slush fund for pork-barreling politicians.  Read more about the housing bailout bill.

CAGW Observes Cost of Government Day, 2008

CAGW observed Cost of Government Day on July 16 by expressing outrage at the federal, state, and local governments’ continued waste of hundreds of billions of tax dollars on outdated, ineffective, duplicative, and non-essential programs and agencies.  Cost of Government Day is the date on which the average American worker has earned enough to pay off his or her share of the tax and regulatory burdens imposed by all levels of government, according to the Americans for Tax Reform Foundation.  “Today taxpayers have been released from state servitude and can begin to provide for themselves and their families,” CAGW President Tom Schatz announced.  Americans now work more than half of the year - 197 days - to pay their share of the cost of government, with 84 of those days due to federal spending alone.  This year, the average American needed to work an additional 16 days to pay off his or her cost of government compared to 2000 and four days more than last year.  Read more about Cost of Government Day, 2008.

 


CAGW Opposes FCC-Imposed Net Neutrality

CAGW this month expressed opposition to news that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering levying sanctions against the Comcast Corporation for blocking some Internet traffic.  “What the FCC is contemplating amounts to imposing network neutrality,” protested CAGW President Tom Schatz.  Proposals for so-called “net neutrality” would have the federal government mandate that Internet service providers allow all traffic to flow, regardless of cost or need.  Any government interference with or regulation of the Internet will require the requisite bureaucracy to manage, and the cost will be foisted onto taxpayers.  Once a bureaucracy is created, it naturally expands, not contracts.  Consumers have more Internet choices than ever before.  Cable, satellite, and wireless broadband providers are competing head-to-head for customers and providing better services at lower prices.  Coerced net neutrality would suppress such innovation.  Pricing and web content are both means of competition.  Without a plethora of consumer options, monopolies will arise and push out smaller companies.  Read more about net neutrality.

 

Take Action!

Tell Congress:  End America’s Dependence on Foreign Oil!

Tell Your U.S. Rep.  & Sens. to Publish Their Earmark Requests!

Tell Your Lawmakers: Sign the Earmark Reform Pledge!



Pork Alerts

Senate Commerce/
Justice/Science

House Energy & Water

House Commerce/
Justice/Science

House Labor/HHS/
Education

House Interior & Environment
 

Visit CAGW's Blog!

Give us your opinions and tips about government waste in your area on "The Swine Line"!

Pork Advisory Level: Elevated


Read more
about the Pork Advisory System.